Jul 29 2006
Tits
This has been circulating across the blogsphere lately: ‘Breast’ Cover Gets Mixed Reaction
These readers weren’t complaining about a sexually explicit cover, but rather one of a baby nursing, on a wholesome parenting magazine — yet another sign that Americans are squeamish over the sight of a nursing breast…
“My kid needed to eat,” says the 29-year-old from South Abingdon, Mass. And she wasn’t going to go hide in a not-so-clean restroom: “I don’t send people to the bathroom when THEY want to eat,” she says.
My wife is a La Leche League leader, so I know a bit about breast-feeding and its benefits to children and their mothers; but still, the reaction of those ignorant about how children have been fed FOREVER is sad.
The photo is hardly controversial: it shows no evidence of a nipple. Hell, the baby could be suckling a fat person’s elbow.
There’s a simple solution to acclimate those with JUST a sexual attitude towards breasts: have women show their tits ALL THE TIME.



This blog could use a parental advisory warning for language. And I don’t even have to look at the results to know that your esteemed associates who read this blog will vote YES, every one of them. I would pick the first three “only” answers, and add, “If a woman wants to.”
> This blog could use a parental advisory warning for language
Fuck that.
For a less beligerent version of Steel White Table, go to Phillip’s Room.
f**k off phillip, go to church!
:)
Tits are my favourite two things in the whole world!
This is hilarious!
Jim Carrey breast feeding!
Maybe if you didn’t include the “Jim Carrey breast feeding!” part I would’ve clicked the link. Maybe.
It’s from Me, Myself, and Irene. It’s not too bad. Honest!
Oh, and the actress in it is a total MILF!
I said Yes but I really mean Yes if they feel so inclined and Yes, a lot more than they do now. It’s a breast folks; no big deal and besides… it’s obviously already occupied.